Sunday, January 29, 2017

Danger of Being Right, Part 2

As I mentioned to Jim in a response: Love is a commitment to the best interest of another.

Being right is about you; love is about the other person.


But isn’t it important to be right?


Consider this. When we were in the wrong, God’s response was self-sacrifice. Christ died for us (Romans 5:8). That was his response to our enmity. He didn’t insist we first acknowledge that we were in the wrong. He didn’t insist that change our ways or come over to his way of thinking. He did something for us. This we call Grace.


Is this your response when you disagree? Could you do something good for someone who is in any way you’re enemy? Does being right become the line that divides us? What about grace?


Think of the power of demonstrating that you care more about the person than the issue. This is where change comes from. It must always be acceptance first, change later. If you reject them, why should they listen to you?


This is one of those areas where I’m fascinated about truth. Years ago, I read a lot of psychology books and one thing became clear to me: Acceptance first, change second. If you really want to change for the better, you must accept who you are first. If you want others to change, it can only happen in a space created by unconditional acceptance.


This true was supremely important to me because it is the message of Grace. God accepts you for who you are, and that provides a solid ground upon which true change can take place. Without acceptance first, no real change can take place. Shame does not work. Change as a prerequisite for acceptance does not work.

I would even hold this up as a near proof of the truth of the gospel. I know of no other religion that makes the same offer. In other words, no other religion that is psychologically true.

Being right is not what God values most.

Saturday, January 21, 2017

The Danger in Being Right

There is nothing wrong with being right. In fact, everyone ought to always think they are right. You ought to live according to what you believe to be right until you are proven otherwise, and then you should live according to that right. Being right is not the problem; the problem is in assuming that being right is the ultimate good. Being right is NOT the ultimate good.


If being right is your ultimate good to you, it is because your self-worth is tied to it. To put it another way, your justification comes from being right. Any challenge to your position on an issue, is by its very nature a personal attack, because it undermines your security, your sense of self.


This can more dangerously apply on a religious level where you believe your justification before God is based on being right, having the right doctrine, displaying the right behavior. This belief undermines your sense security in your own salvation.


When you make being right the ultimate good, you create an idol of it; it becomes your god.


Therefore you live in service to the rightness of your position. You must defend it at all cost. It automatically divides you from others who disagree. The end result is pride and self- righteousness. See, if you are right, then I must be wrong, and if I am wrong, then you are better than I am. You, then, have the right to judge me, and perhaps even to punish me. The wrong must be converted, or cast out. In fact, You must judge and correct me. You cannot leave me in my error; my “salvation” depends on it, right?


One example of the problem would be political correctness. Nothing against being sensitive to what might offend others, but the extreme of political correctness comes with an air of disdain. Those who misspeak are not gently corrected; they are held up to public shame in an attempt to bring them to heel to the “right” way of speaking, or thinking. The individual who does not speak “right” is deemed unacceptable.


But this applies to any situation. If you are seriously considering what I‘ve said so far, look at any area of your life: politics, work, family. Why is it so important to be right?


Consider marriage. How long do you think my marriage would last if every time I was right, I insisted that my wife acknowledge that I am right. Anyone in a relationship can think of a time when they knew they were right about something and could not get the other person to admit it. But a marriage does not depend on a strict adherence to truth in all its forms. There are other things that are more important.


In a marriage specifically, you learn when to let it go. If you haven’t learned that; you should. There’s a concept called, “making the perfect the enemy of the good.” I see couples fight in this way all too often. They squabble over minor matters as though they are willing to sacrifice the entire relationship if they don’t get their way about squeezing the toothpaste in the middle. If this is you, step back and look at the relationship as a whole. If it is a good relationship on the whole, you should let this one go.


But so far, this has been predicated on the assumption that you are right. But what if you’re actually wrong? Never mind that damage that occurs when your insistence on being right is out of proportion with the importance of the issue. Imagine the damage that occurs when you are knowingly or unknowingly defending a position that is actually wrong.


The energy you must expend in order to avoid admitting that you were wrong is debilitating. But you can’t admit you were wrong; that undermines your place in the hierarchy. It is humiliating. If you don't know you are wrong, your insistence undermines your credibility. Imagine how you look to those who know better. Will the ever listen to you again? Or imagine the damage done to those who fall under your sway. Be right, or be humble. Be both.

But the bottom line is the ultimate good is not being right. The ultimate good is love.



Tune in next week to find out the difference.

Friday, January 6, 2017

Worry is a form of self-punishment.

Worrying about a future event doubles your suffering. If something bad is going to happen, when it happens you will suffer through it. All worrying does is allow you to suffer once before the bad thing actually happens then suffer again when it actually does happen. The end result is that you have suffered twice from the same bad event.

What might be even worse is when that bad thing never materializes. Now you have made yourself to suffer for no reason at all.

If worrying could actually make a difference, then it would be a worthwhile endeavor. But it does nothing. Concern should spur action. If there is nothing to do about it, then you have to let it go.

Why ruin today because of what might happen tomorrow?